п»ї
V T M 2013
VALUES REVIEW MODULE 2013
MANUAL
by simply Geert Hofstede and Michael jordan Minkov
NEVER TO BE REPLICATED IN WHOLE OR PERHAPS IN PARTS WITHOUT THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF THE COPYRIGHT LAWS HOLDER
Release May 2013
Copyright @ Geert Hofstede BV
[email protected] nl; www.geerthofstede.eu
Articles Page
1 . Purpose of the VSM 2013: comparing nationwide samples2
2 . The VSM 2013 is usually not for evaluating individuals3
3. The VSM 2013 is usually not for assessing organizations4
5. VSM 2013 scores certainly not comparable to posted scores5
five. The VSM 2013 is usually not a instructing tool5
six. Formulas for index calculation6
7. Reliability of the VSM 2013 being unfaithful
8. Circumstances for the use of the VSM 2013 10
on the lookout for. History of the VSM 15
10. Comparison of the VSM 2013 with earlier versions 13 11. Translations in the VSM 2013 13
12. Submitting effects for each of our files 14
13. Referrals 15
1 . Purpose of the VSM 2013: comparing nationwide samples
The Values Review Module 2013 (VSM 2013) is a 30-item paper-and-pencil customer survey developed pertaining to comparing culturally influenced ideals and sentiments of identical respondents coming from two or more countries, or sometimes regions inside countries. This allows scores to be computed on six dimensions of national tradition, on the basis of several questions per dimension: therefore it matters 6 times 4 = 24 content questions. The other six questions look for demographic data: the respondent's gender, age, education level, kind of work, present nationality, and nationality at birth.
The six proportions measured had been developed in the work of Geert Hofstede and his co-researchers, and are defined extensively inside the 3rd release of Hofstede, Hofstede & Minkov, 2010. They manage key concerns in nationwide societies, well-known from social anthropology and cross-cultural study..
The earliest open public version from the instrument (VSM 82) protected four proportions, derived from a comparison of subsidiaries of the IBM corporation in 40 countries. The next variation (VSM 94) covered five; the additional aspect was found in a comparison of students in 23 countries using a customer survey mainly created by Chinese college students (Hofstede & Bond, 1988). The sixth dimension in our version was derived from Minkov's analysis worldwide Values Study in up to 81 countries (Inglehart et al., 2007) and other recently available options. For more information about the history of the VSM see Section on the lookout for of this Manual.
The word module implies that the questionnaire can be used within a larger device comparing countries on other aspects.
Research knowledge has shown the fact that answers for the 24 articles questions are influenced by nationality of the respondents. This is not to say that many respondent of nationality A gives 1 answer and everyone of a nationality B one more, but one can expect organized differences involving the average answers from a sample with nationality A and a identical sample via nationality N (in statistical terms, a great analysis of variance around the answer ratings shows a significant country effect). As the relationship is statistical, the selections per region should be of sufficient size. An ideal size for a homogeneous sample can be 50 respondents. Sample sizes smaller than 20 should not be used, as outlying answers by single respondents will unduly affect the outcomes. If examples are heterogeneous (composed of unequal sub-samples) these figures apply to the sub-samples.
Following to nationality, answers towards the 24 content material questions may also reflect various other characteristics in the respondents, including their male or female, age, education level, occupation, sort of work as well as the point in time after they answered the questions. Consequently comparisons of countries should be based on samples of participants who are matched about all criteria other than nationality that could...
Sources: Chinese Tradition Connection (a team of 24 researchers, 1987)
" Chinese principles and the look for culture-free dimensions of culture”
Hofstede, Geert (1980)
Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values
Hofstede, Geert (1991)
Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Brain
Hofstede, Geert (2001)
Culture's Consequences, (Second Edition): Comparing Values, Behaviours, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations
Hofstede, Geert and Michael Harris Bond (1988)
" The Confucius connection: From ethnical roots to economic growth”
Hofstede, Geert and Robert R. McCrae (2004)
" Personality and culture revisited: Linking characteristics and measurements of culture”
Hofstede, Geert and Gert Jan Hofstede (2005)
Cultures and Organizations: Software from the Mind
Hofstede, Geert, Gert Jan Hofstede and Eileen Minkov (2010)
Cultures and Organizations: Application of the Head
Hofstede, Geert, Bram Neuijen, Denise Daval Ohayv and Geert Sanders
(1990) " Measuring company cultures: A qualitative and quantitative research across 20 cases”
Hofstede, Geert, Adriana V. Garibaldi de Hilal, Sigmar Malvezzi, Betania
Tanure and Henk Vinken (2010) " Comparing regional nationalities within a region: Lessons coming from Brazil”
Hoppe, Michael H. (1990)
A Comparative Examine of Country Elites: International Differences in Work-related Values and Learning and their Implications pertaining to Management Training and Creation
Inglehart, Ronald, Miguel BasaГ±ez and Alejandro Moreno (1998)
Human Ideals and Beliefs: A Cross-Cultural Sourcebook
Inglehart, Ronald, Miguel BasaГ±ez, Jaime DГez-Medrano, Loek Halman
and Ruud Luijkx (2004)
Man Beliefs and Values: A Cross-Cultural Sourcebook Based on the 1999-2002 Beliefs Surveys. Mexico: Siglo XXI Editores
Inglehart, Ronald and associates (2007 and ongoing)
Minkov, Eileen (2007)
The actual Us Diverse and Related: A New Interpretation of the World Ideals Survey and also other Cross-Cultural Data
Minkov, Michael (2011)
Ethnic Differences in a Globalizing Universe
Minkov, Michael (2013)
Cross-Cultural Analysis: The Science and Skill of Assessing the Planet's Modern Communities and Their Cultures
Minkov, Michael jordan and Hofstede, Geert (2010)
" Long- versus immediate orientation: fresh perspectives”
Minkov, Michael and Hofstede, Geert (2011)
" The progression of Hofstede's doctrine”
Minkov, Michael and Hofstede, Geert (2012)
" Hofstede's fifth dimension: Fresh evidence from your World Beliefs Survey”
Vehicle Vugt, Ronnie G. M. A. (2006)
Culture's Implications Re-examined
